A Strategic Outlook on Türkiye’s AI-Powered Defence Industry

Strategic Argument and Areas of Debate

The structural transition toward artificial intelligence-driven military autonomy in the Republic of Türkiye fundamentally reshapes regional security dynamics, contrasting sharply with the anticipated return to maximum pressure campaigns and uncompromising pro-Israel policies under a potential second United States administration. This growing divergence highlights a critical geopolitical tension between achieving indigenous technological sovereignty in the Middle East and external efforts to enforce a rigid, transactional security architecture through expanded normalisation frameworks.

Executive Summary

The strategic landscape of the Middle East is being rapidly redefined by the Republic of Türkiye‘s aggressive implementation of its National Artificial Intelligence Strategy, championed by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, which accelerates indigenous military capabilities and reduces reliance on foreign systems through institutions like TÜBİTAK. Concurrently, a potential second administration under Donald Trump, guided by frameworks such as Project 2025, threatens to destabilise the region by intensifying maximum pressure on Iran and providing uncritical military support to Israel, deliberately undermining the United Nations and defunding bodies like the United Nations Relief and Works Agency. As the United States pushes to expand the Abraham Accords to include Saudi Arabia, the profound intersection of Türkiye‘s AI-powered modernisation and rigid American transactional diplomacy creates a volatile environment that severely limits the prospects for a two-state solution and lasting regional stability.

Analytical Framework and Key Drivers

Indigenous Defence Technological Sovereignty: The systematic development of local artificial intelligence capabilities through the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy enables a critical reduction in foreign dependency and bolsters national security resilience.

Maximum Pressure Sanctions Architecture: Anticipated United States policies rely heavily on severe economic restrictions targeting the energy sector to neutralise Iranian proxy networks and permanently dismantle the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

Transactional Regional Normalisation Diplomacy: Geopolitical efforts to expand the Abraham Accords prioritise bilateral security and economic agreements between the United States, Israel, and Saudi Arabia over comprehensive conflict resolution or Palestinian statehood.

Public-Private Defence Innovation Nexus: Collaborative ecosystems linking governmental bodies like TÜBİTAK with private defence contractors accelerate the deployment of autonomous systems and advanced radar architectures in active conflict zones.

Strategic Geoeconomic Diversification Mechanisms: Sanctioned actors systematically circumvent Western financial constraints by strengthening alternative trade relationships, notably through increased petroleum exports to the People’s Republic of China.

Strategic Assessment & Empirical Findings

  • The Turkish artificial intelligence sector demonstrates rapid expansion, scaling from merely five firms in 2000 to nearly 1,200 enterprises by 2024, representing a 20 per cent year-over-year increase in market participation.
  • Financial projections indicate the Turkish artificial intelligence market will achieve a valuation of 1.62 billion USD by 2024, escalating at a compound annual growth rate of 28.72 per cent to reach 7.37 billion USD by 2030.
  • The global prominence of Turkish defence manufacturing is unequivocally evidenced by the inclusion of seven distinct corporations on the prestigious Defense News Top 100 index.
  • Prior application of the maximum pressure doctrine proved economically devastating but strategically ineffective, costing the Iranian economy an estimated 200 billion USD while uranium enrichment levels escalated from the 3.67 per cent limit to 60 per cent.
  • American military and financial assistance to Israel exceeded 22.7 billion USD between October 2023 and September 2024, a figure expected to surge alongside potential shifts in regional security paradigms.
  • The systematic evasion of economic sanctions enabled Iran to sustain its national economy by exporting approximately 70 billion USD worth of petroleum products to Chinese markets throughout 2023.

Geopolitical Trajectories & Policy Risks

  • The United States‘ aggressive expansion of the normalisation process risks cementing structural instability and permanent regional conflict by systemically ignoring Palestinian statehood and granting diplomatic impunity to the Israeli government.
  • Saudi Arabia faces an acute strategic vulnerability in its diplomatic negotiations, balancing the absolute necessity of a binding American security umbrella against the geopolitical risk of alienating regional allies by aligning with maximalist Israeli military objectives.
  • The Republic of Türkiye effectively mitigates its historical dependency on foreign military procurement through indigenous technological development, though it remains exposed to long-term institutional challenges regarding human capital retention and data security compliance within its defence sector.

Critical Policy Questions & Responses

Question 1 Why does the United States’ reliance on maximum pressure sanctions reshape Iran’s geopolitical and economic alignment?

Answer: The implementation of severe economic sanctions by the United States inadvertently accelerates Iran’s integration into alternative global financial architectures, most notably solidifying the People’s Republic of China as its primary trading partner. By exporting vast quantities of petroleum to Chinese markets in 2023, Tehran successfully circumvented Western economic isolation, thereby demonstrating the structural limitations of unilateral financial coercion.

Question 2 What strategic trade-offs does Saudi Arabia face when negotiating normalisation within the expanding framework of the Abraham Accords?

Answer: Saudi Arabia must carefully balance its Vision 2030 economic objectives against the profound regional risks associated with formalising relations with Israel during periods of intense military conflict. Riyadh requires a robust, long-term security guarantee from the United States to counter Iranian threats, but accepting a subordinate role within the existing Abraham Accords framework could severely compromise its leadership position among Gulf Cooperation Council states.

Question 3 How does the successful deployment of the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy affect Türkiye’s position in global defence markets?

Answer: The execution of the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy directly transitions the Republic of Türkiye from a technology consumer to a primary exporter of advanced autonomous military systems. By integrating deep learning algorithms into platforms like the Akıncı unmanned aerial vehicle, the Turkish defence sector has significantly enhanced its operational autonomy, ultimately securing lucrative positions for domestic corporations on international defence indices.

Question 4 What are the long-term implications of Project 2025’s proposed foreign policy directives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Answer: The implementation of strategic frameworks resembling Project 2025 during a potential second Trump administration would systematically dismantle the diplomatic foundations of the two-state solution by offering unconditional political and military support to Israel. This approach permanently marginalises Palestinian statehood aspirations and severely defunds critical humanitarian infrastructure such as the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, virtually guaranteeing cyclical violence across the Levant.

Key Actors and Systemic Dynamics

  • United States → Enables → Israel
  • National Artificial Intelligence Strategy → Accelerates → Turkish Artificial Intelligence Sector
  • Maximum Pressure Strategy → Undermines → Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
  • People’s Republic of China → Strengthens → Iran
  • Project 2025 → Shapes → United States Foreign Policy
  • Abraham Accords → Constrains → Two-State Solution
  • TÜBİTAK → Supports → Artificial Intelligence Startups
  • Saudi Arabia → Coordinates with → United States
  • United Nations Relief and Works Agency → Is affected by → United States
  • ASELSAN → Strengthens → Türkiye’s AI-Powered Defence Industry

APA

MLA

Chicago

Download the Policy Outlook
Ravale Mohydin

Ravale Mohydin

Researcher
More about the author →

Analytical Digest

The shifting geopolitical architecture of the Middle East is fundamentally driven by the structural divergence between emerging regional technological autonomy and the imposition of rigid, transactional diplomatic frameworks. The Republic of Türkiye aggressively pursues military sovereignty through its National Artificial Intelligence Strategy, expanding its domestic artificial intelligence market from five firms in 2000 to nearly 1,200 enterprises by 2024. This robust innovation ecosystem, directly supported by TÜBİTAK and industry leaders like ASELSAN, strategically positions the nation as a premier global exporter of autonomous defence systems. Conversely, a prospective second administration under Donald Trump threatens to destabilise regional security by implementing the aggressive directives outlined in Project 2025. By reinstating a maximum pressure strategy against Iran, delivering over 22.7 billion USD in unconditional military assistance to Israel, and structurally marginalising the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, the United States exacerbates systemic conflict. As Washington attempts to integrate Saudi Arabia into the Abraham Accords, these intersecting trajectories highlight a profound strategic dilemma: the irreconcilable tension between achieving indigenous Middle Eastern technological resilience and enduring the destabilising consequences of external geopolitical coercion.

MORE FROM CURRENT CATEGORY